Ad is loading...
RECS vs SPYC
RECS vs SPYC Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs SPYC
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$34.84
Change+$0.05 (+0.14%)
Volume$1.5K
Net Assets2.71B
Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF
Price$39.73
Change-$0.18 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets77.63M
RECS vs SPYC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. SPYC commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Buy and SPYC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.71B vs. SPYC (77.6M). SPYC has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: SPYC (6.870) vs RECS (0.462). RECS was incepted earlier than SPYC: RECS (6 years) vs SPYC (5 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than SPYC (0.53). RECS has a higher turnover SPYC (3.00) vs SPYC (3.00).
| RECS | SPYC | RECS / SPYC | |
| Gain YTD | 0.462 | 6.870 | 7% |
| Net Assets | 2.71B | 77.6M | 3,487% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.53 | 28% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 3.00 | 1,633% |
| Yield | 0.73 | 0.98 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | SPYC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 72% | 9 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.84% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
More | ||||