Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs WOMN
RECS vs WOMN Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs WOMN
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$39.91
Change+$0.12 (+0.30%)
Volume$1.12K
Net Assets4.32B
Impact Shares Women’s Empowerment ETF
Price$39.73
Change-$0.25 (-0.63%)
Volume$104
Net Assets63.07M
RECS vs WOMN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. WOMN commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Hold and WOMN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.32B vs. WOMN (63.1M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than WOMN: RECS (14.934) vs WOMN (4.562). RECS was incepted earlier than WOMN: RECS (6 years) vs WOMN (7 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than WOMN (0.75). RECS has a higher turnover WOMN (21.00) vs WOMN (21.00).
| RECS | WOMN | RECS / WOMN | |
| Gain YTD | 14.934 | 4.562 | 327% |
| Net Assets | 4.32B | 63.1M | 6,842% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.75 | 20% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 21.00 | 233% |
| Yield | 0.59 | 1.14 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | WOMN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | 8 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.55% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -4.43% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.60% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
More | ||||
WOMN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WOMN and CARR have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WOMN and CARR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WOMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WOMN | 100% | -0.16% | ||
| CARR - WOMN | 16% Poorly correlated | -2.11% | ||
| DELL - WOMN | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| MSFT - WOMN | 15% Poorly correlated | -2.70% | ||
| LLY - WOMN | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.82% | ||
| MDT - WOMN | 14% Poorly correlated | +4.69% | ||
More | ||||