Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs XRLV
RECS vs XRLV Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs XRLV
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$40.33
Change-$0.21 (-0.52%)
Volume$947
Net Assets3.99B
Invesco S&P 500® ex-Rate Snsv LowVol ETF
Price$54.73
Change-$0.45 (-0.82%)
Volume$200
Net Assets35.95M
RECS vs XRLV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. XRLV commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Buy and XRLV is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.99B vs. XRLV (36M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than XRLV: RECS (17.100) vs XRLV (5.733). RECS was incepted earlier than XRLV: RECS (6 years) vs XRLV (11 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than XRLV (0.25). XRLV has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| RECS | XRLV | RECS / XRLV | |
| Gain YTD | 17.100 | 5.733 | 298% |
| Net Assets | 3.99B | 36M | 11,075% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.25 | 60% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 66.00 | 74% |
| Yield | 0.60 | 2.03 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | XRLV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | 10 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 71% | 8 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.47% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.11% | ||
More | ||||
XRLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that XRLV and LYB have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XRLV and LYB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XRLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XRLV | 100% | -0.16% | ||
| LYB - XRLV | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
| GD - XRLV | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
| UNP - XRLV | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.34% | ||
| TGT - XRLV | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.24% | ||
| HOLX - XRLV | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||