Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs XVOL
RECS vs XVOL Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs XVOL
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$39.98
Change+$0.24 (+0.60%)
Volume$662.45K
Net Assets4.1B
Acruence Active Hedge US Equity ETF
Price$23.19
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
Volume$1.27K
Net Assets2.32M
RECS vs XVOL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. XVOL commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Hold and XVOL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.1B vs. XVOL (2.32M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than XVOL: RECS (15.482) vs XVOL (8.676). RECS was incepted earlier than XVOL: RECS (6 years) vs XVOL (5 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than XVOL (0.83). XVOL has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| RECS | XVOL | RECS / XVOL | |
| Gain YTD | 15.482 | 8.676 | 178% |
| Net Assets | 4.1B | 2.32M | 176,661% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.83 | 18% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 361.00 | 14% |
| Yield | 0.60 | 2.85 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | XVOL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 70% | 10 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.18% | ||
More | ||||
XVOL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that XVOL and WHR have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XVOL and WHR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XVOL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XVOL | 100% | N/A | ||
| WHR - XVOL | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
| EPD - XVOL | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
| SOLV - XVOL | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.01% | ||
| IR - XVOL | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.86% | ||
| RCL - XVOL | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||