Ad is loading...
REMCX vs RNWFX
REMCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts REMCX vs RNWFX
Russell Inv Emerging Markets C
Price$14.79
Change-$0.31 (-2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets736.53M
American Funds New World R5
Price$77.31
Change-$1.87 (-2.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.34B
REMCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
REMCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REMCX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 62.3B vs. REMCX (737M). REMCX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: REMCX (1.67) vs RNWFX (1.17). REMCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: REMCX (26 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). REMCX (2.31) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). REMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). REMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: REMCX (0) vs RNWFX (250). REMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. RNWFX (-1.48). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.78 vs. REMCX (23.92).
| REMCX | RNWFX | REMCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.62 | 353% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.31 | 0.62 | 373% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.426 | 0.065 | 6,840% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 737M | 62.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.17 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | -1.48 | -459% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.02 | 0.31 | -1,317% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.92 | 50.78 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.48 | 42.27 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers