Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RERAX vs TINFX
RERAX vs TINFX Comparison
Open Charts RERAX vs TINFX
American Funds EUPAC R1
Price$57.98
Change+$0.30 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.49B
Thornburg International Growth R5
Price$26.40
Change+$0.14 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets730.14M
RERAX vs TINFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RERAX vs. TINFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RERAX is a Hold and TINFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. TINFX (730M). TINFX pays higher dividends than RERAX: TINFX (0.33) vs RERAX (0.23). RERAX was incepted earlier than TINFX: RERAX (23 years) vs TINFX (18 years). RERAX (1.57) and TINFX (1.57) have similar cost to investors . TINFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.57 vs. RERAX (35.00). TINFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: TINFX (0) vs RERAX (250). RERAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.44 vs. TINFX (-2.73). RERAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.30 vs. TINFX (-6.39).
| RERAX | TINFX | RERAX / TINFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.99 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.57 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.971 | 11.644 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 730M | 18,219% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.33 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.44 | -2.73 | -273% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.30 | 30.30 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.30 | -6.39 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.08 | 45.31 | 73% |