Ad is loading...
RERBX vs SIFZX
RERBX vs SIFZX Comparison
Open Charts RERBX vs SIFZX
American Funds Europacific Growth R2
Price$51.96
Change+$0.67 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets121.56B
Saturna International Z
Price$21.50
Change+$0.33 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.53M
RERBX vs SIFZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RERBX vs. SIFZX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RERBX is a Buy and SIFZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 122B vs. SIFZX (63.5M). RERBX pays higher dividends than SIFZX: RERBX (0.48) vs SIFZX (0.09). RERBX was incepted earlier than SIFZX: RERBX (23 years) vs SIFZX (8 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SIFZX (0.77). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. SIFZX (19.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SIFZX: RERBX (250) vs SIFZX (1000). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.20 vs. SIFZX (-6.04). SIFZX return over 5 years is better than : 42.25 vs. RERBX (19.63).
| RERBX | SIFZX | RERBX / SIFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.77 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.77 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.865 | -4.121 | -21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 122B | 63.5M | 192,126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.09 | 519% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.20 | -6.04 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.11 | 12.32 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.63 | 42.25 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.30 | N/A | - |