Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RERBX vs SIFZX
RERBX vs SIFZX Comparison
Open Charts RERBX vs SIFZX
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$58.35
Change-$0.12 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.64B
Saturna International Z
Price$25.38
Change+$0.06 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.07M
RERBX vs SIFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RERBX vs. SIFZX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RERBX is a Buy and SIFZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. SIFZX (75.1M). RERBX pays higher dividends than SIFZX: RERBX (0.25) vs SIFZX (0.08). RERBX was incepted earlier than SIFZX: RERBX (23 years) vs SIFZX (8 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SIFZX (0.73). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. SIFZX (19.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SIFZX: RERBX (250) vs SIFZX (1000). SIFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.08 vs. RERBX (4.07). SIFZX return over 5 years is better than : 37.82 vs. RERBX (4.96).
| RERBX | SIFZX | RERBX / SIFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.73 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.73 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.749 | 14.674 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 75.1M | 179,760% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.08 | 318% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.07 | 6.08 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.16 | 46.04 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.96 | 37.82 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement