Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RERBX vs TIGCX
RERBX vs TIGCX Comparison
Open Charts RERBX vs TIGCX
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$61.34
Change-$0.33 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.4B
Thornburg International Growth C
Price$22.69
Change-$0.10 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets746.6M
RERBX vs TIGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RERBX vs. TIGCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RERBX is a Buy and TIGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. TIGCX (747M). RERBX pays higher dividends than TIGCX: RERBX (0.24) vs TIGCX (0.00). RERBX was incepted earlier than TIGCX: RERBX (23 years) vs TIGCX (19 years). TIGCX (2.37) is less costly to investors than RERBX (1.56). TIGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.57 vs. RERBX (35.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TIGCX: RERBX (250) vs TIGCX (5000). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.07 vs. TIGCX (-4.74). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.62 vs. TIGCX (-14.99).
| RERBX | TIGCX | RERBX / TIGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 2.37 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 2.37 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.629 | 14.307 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 747M | 18,474% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.07 | -4.74 | -191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.43 | 36.93 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.62 | -14.99 | -64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.40 | 26.69 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement