Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RERCX vs TINFX
RERCX vs TINFX Comparison
Open Charts RERCX vs TINFX
American Funds Europacific Growth R3
Price$58.15
Change-$0.13 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.68B
Thornburg International Growth R5
Price$25.58
Change-$0.09 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets730.21M
RERCX vs TINFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RERCX vs. TINFX commentary
Jun 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RERCX is a Hold and TINFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. TINFX (730M). RERCX pays higher dividends than TINFX: RERCX (0.78) vs TINFX (0.34). RERCX was incepted earlier than TINFX: RERCX (23 years) vs TINFX (17 years). TINFX (1.57) is less costly to investors than RERCX (1.12). TINFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.57 vs. RERCX (30.00). TINFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERCX: TINFX (0) vs RERCX (250). RERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.75 vs. TINFX (-5.45). RERCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.93 vs. TINFX (4.59).
| RERCX | TINFX | RERCX / TINFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.99 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.57 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.484 | 7.524 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 730M | 18,219% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.34 | 230% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.75 | -5.45 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.99 | 13.99 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.93 | 4.59 | 499% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.72 | 28.41 | 69% |