RESCU
Price
$0.13
Change
+$0.01 (+8.33%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
SLFPF
Price
$1.77
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

RESCU vs SLFPF

Header iconRESCU vs SLFPF Comparison
Open Charts RESCU vs SLFPFBanner chart's image
Rescap Liquidating Trust
Price$0.13
Change+$0.01 (+8.33%)
Volume$274
CapitalizationN/A
ABRDN
Price$1.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$150
CapitalizationN/A
RESCU vs SLFPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
RESCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLFPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RESCU vs. SLFPF commentary
Dec 27, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RESCU is a Buy and SLFPF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2024
Stock price -- (RESCU: $0.13 vs. SLFPF: $1.77)
Brand notoriety: RESCU and SLFPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RESCU: 126% vs. SLFPF: 12%
Market capitalization -- RESCU: $0 vs. SLFPF: $5.79B
RESCU [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. SLFPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RESCU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLFPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RESCU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLFPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLFPF is a better buy in the long-term than RESCU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RESCU’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLFPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RESCU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SLFPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both RESCU and SLFPF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

RESCU (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SLFPF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.00% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLFPF YTD gains are higher at: -19.910 vs. RESCU (-78.333).
RESCUSLFPFRESCU / SLFPF
CapitalizationN/A5.79B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-78.333-19.910393%
P/E RatioN/A7.54-
RevenueN/A2.31B-
Total CashN/A1.34B-
Total DebtN/A707M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RESCU vs SLFPF: Fundamental Ratings
RESCU
SLFPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3235
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10050
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9559
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLFPF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as RESCU (36). This means that SLFPF’s stock grew similarly to RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RESCU (100). This means that SLFPF’s stock grew similarly to RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RESCU (100). This means that SLFPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RESCU (95). This means that SLFPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RESCU (100). This means that SLFPF’s stock grew similarly to RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RESCUSLFPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RESCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLFPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMLKX21.300.11
+0.52%
Shelton S&P Smallcap Index K
TRMIX32.210.08
+0.25%
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value I
SUHCX22.620.05
+0.22%
DWS Health and Wellness C
SLVAX33.390.02
+0.06%
Columbia Select Large Cap Value A
PLAAX15.85-0.03
-0.19%
PACE Large Co Growth Equity A

RESCU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RESCU has been loosely correlated with SFES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RESCU jumps, then SFES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RESCU
1D Price
Change %
RESCU100%
N/A
SFES - RESCU
40%
Loosely correlated
+5.08%
ASXSF - RESCU
21%
Poorly correlated
+9.26%
FSK - RESCU
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
SOLCF - RESCU
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.78%
SLFPY - RESCU
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SLFPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLFPF and SLFPY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLFPF and SLFPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLFPF
1D Price
Change %
SLFPF100%
N/A
SLFPY - SLFPF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STJPF - SLFPF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUILF - SLFPF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RAFI - SLFPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RESCU - SLFPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More