RETL
Price
$9.15
Change
+$0.07 (+0.77%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
35.16M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SSO
Price
$67.00
Change
-$0.21 (-0.31%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
8.02B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RETL vs SSO

RETL vs SSO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X ETF (RETL) vs. ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO)

Key Takeaways

  • RETL provides 3x daily leveraged exposure to the retail sector via the S&P Retail Select Industry Index, while SSO delivers 2x daily leveraged exposure to the broad S&P 500 Index.
  • RETL concentrates on approximately 80 retail-focused holdings primarily in consumer discretionary, whereas SSO holds around 500 securities mirroring the S&P 500's large-cap technology and growth leaders.
  • RETL carries a higher expense ratio of 0.96% compared to SSO's 0.87% net expense ratio, reflecting its narrower thematic focus.
  • Both ETFs employ daily-reset leveraged structures, amplifying short-term volatility and making them suitable for tactical positioning rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies.
  • RETL offers targeted upside in consumer spending cycles, while SSO provides diversified participation in overall U.S. equity market trends.
  • Structural differences in leverage multiple, sector concentration, and diversification create distinct risk-return profiles for investors seeking amplified exposure.

Introduction

RETL and SSO represent two distinct leveraged ETF strategies that appeal to investors seeking amplified equity exposure. RETL targets the retail sector with triple leverage, while SSO magnifies broad large-cap U.S. market performance with double leverage. They do not compete directly but offer alternative ways to express bullish views on consumer trends versus overall economic growth. This comparison highlights their structural differences to help investors evaluate fit within tactical allocation frameworks.

Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X ETF (RETL) Overview

The Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the S&P Retail Select Industry Index. It maintains approximately 80 holdings concentrated in retail and consumer discretionary companies. Top holdings typically include names such as Grocery Outlet Holding Corporation, Sonic Automotive, and Murphy USA. Sector allocation centers almost entirely on consumer discretionary and related retail sub-industries. The fund carries a gross and net expense ratio of 0.96%. As a leveraged ETF, it resets exposure daily and does not seek to deliver the multiple over periods longer than one day. This structure suits short-term tactical trades tied to retail spending patterns and consumer confidence indicators.

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) Overview

The ProShares Ultra S&P500 seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the S&P 500 Index. It holds approximately 500 securities that replicate the composition of the S&P 500. Top holdings reflect the index's largest constituents, including technology leaders such as NVIDIA Corporation, Apple Inc., and Microsoft Corporation. Sector allocations mirror the broad S&P 500, with significant weights in information technology, financials, and healthcare. The fund features a net expense ratio of 0.87%. Like other daily-reset leveraged products, SSO aims to achieve its multiple only for a single trading day and exhibits compounding effects over longer horizons. Its broad diversification provides leveraged participation across the U.S. large-cap equity market.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The retail sector tracked by RETL remains sensitive to consumer spending patterns, interest rate environments, and e-commerce shifts. Broader macroeconomic factors such as employment levels, inflation trends, and discretionary income influence retail performance. SSO's underlying S&P 500 exposure reflects economy-wide dynamics, including corporate earnings growth, technological innovation, and monetary policy impacts. Recent market cycles have featured rotation between growth-oriented large caps and value-oriented consumer sectors, driven by evolving interest rate expectations and supply-chain developments. Both ETFs operate within an environment shaped by ongoing capital flows into U.S. equities and periodic adjustments in leverage demand among tactical investors.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, RETL has exhibited higher volatility due to its 3x leverage and concentrated retail exposure, amplifying moves tied to consumer sentiment and sector-specific news. SSO has delivered magnified participation in broad equity rallies and declines, benefiting from the S&P 500's diversification across multiple sectors. Relative positioning favors SSO for investors seeking leveraged broad-market beta, while RETL suits those targeting retail recovery or expansion themes. Both funds' daily-reset mechanisms lead to performance deviations from their stated multiples over multi-day periods, particularly in volatile or trending markets. Expense differentials and leverage multiples further differentiate their long-term compounding profiles.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would likely favor SSO in the current environment due to its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across the S&P 500, and alignment with sustained large-cap momentum. RETL's higher cost and narrower retail concentration introduce greater sector-specific risk, though it may appeal during targeted consumer spending upswings. The probabilistic assessment prioritizes structural efficiency and diversified trend exposure over concentrated thematic bets.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
RETL vs. SSO commentary
Jul 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RETL is a Hold and SSO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSO has more net assets: 8.02B vs. RETL (35.2M). SSO has a higher annual dividend yield than RETL: SSO (16.156) vs RETL (-0.121). RETL was incepted earlier than SSO: RETL (16 years) vs SSO (20 years). SSO (0.87) has a lower expense ratio than RETL (0.96). RETL has a higher turnover SSO (4.00) vs SSO (4.00).
RETLSSORETL / SSO
Gain YTD-0.12116.156-1%
Net Assets35.2M8.02B0%
Total Expense Ratio0.960.87110%
Turnover71.004.001,775%
Yield0.560.6783%
Fund Existence16 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RETLSSO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RETL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SSO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WWW16.530.41
+2.54%
Wolverine World Wide
NOW106.320.52
+0.49%
ServiceNow Inc.
ELSE7.65N/A
N/A
Electro-Sensors
AFRI10.20N/A
N/A
Forafric Global PLC
M23.25-0.18
-0.77%
Macy's

RETL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RETL has been closely correlated with CAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RETL jumps, then CAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RETL
1D Price
Change %
RETL100%
+0.77%
CAL - RETL
72%
Closely correlated
-5.49%
SHOE - RETL
66%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SIG - RETL
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
GAP - RETL
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
ABG - RETL
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.73%
More