Ad is loading...
REYGF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 30 closing price
SBMCF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

REYGF vs SBMCF

Header iconREYGF vs SBMCF Comparison
Open Charts REYGF vs SBMCFBanner chart's image
Reyna Gold
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$11.4K
CapitalizationN/A
Silver Bullet Mines
Price$0.07
Change-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Volume$79.78K
CapitalizationN/A
REYGF vs SBMCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
REYGF vs. SBMCF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is REYGF is a Hold and SBMCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (REYGF: $0.04 vs. SBMCF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: REYGF and SBMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: REYGF: 33% vs. SBMCF: 379%
Market capitalization -- REYGF: $2.78M vs. SBMCF: $7.05M
REYGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.78M. SBMCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

REYGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBMCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • REYGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, REYGF is a better buy in the long-term than SBMCF.

Price Growth

REYGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SBMCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -20.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBMCF($7.05M) has a higher market cap than REYGF($2.78M). REYGF (-20.468) and SBMCF (-20.780) have similar YTD gains . SBMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.37M vs. REYGF (-4.35M). REYGF has more cash in the bank: 4.71M vs. SBMCF (13.4K). REYGF (0) and SBMCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
REYGFSBMCFREYGF / SBMCF
Capitalization2.78M7.05M39%
EBITDA-4.35M-3.37M129%
Gain YTD-20.468-20.78098%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash4.71M13.4K35,179%
Total DebtN/A887K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAGPX26.66-0.16
-0.60%
American Beacon Large Cap Value Inv
CDHAX30.00-0.19
-0.63%
Calvert International Responsible Idx A
DYGIX15.67-0.18
-1.14%
Meeder Dynamic Allocation Institutional
RLUSX17.63-0.29
-1.62%
Lazard US Equity Focus R6
OLGCX50.11-1.06
-2.07%
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth C

REYGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that REYGF and VLMZF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that REYGF and VLMZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To REYGF
1D Price
Change %
REYGF100%
N/A
VLMZF - REYGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VIORF - REYGF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
TFPM - REYGF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
ODV - REYGF
11%
Poorly correlated
-4.08%
SBMCF - REYGF
11%
Poorly correlated
-13.33%
More

SBMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBMCF and SLVMF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBMCF and SLVMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBMCF
1D Price
Change %
SBMCF100%
-13.33%
SLVMF - SBMCF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GDRZF - SBMCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.84%
CRTIF - SBMCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARBTF - SBMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUMBF - SBMCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-10.77%
More