RF
Price
$23.39
Change
-$0.67 (-2.78%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
18.9B
53 days until earnings call
USB
Price
$45.87
Change
-$0.89 (-1.90%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
68.49B
52 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

RF vs USB

Header iconRF vs USB Comparison
Open Charts RF vs USBBanner chart's image
Regions Financial
Price$23.39
Change-$0.67 (-2.78%)
Volume$9.07M
Capitalization18.9B
US Ban
Price$45.87
Change-$0.89 (-1.90%)
Volume$9.33M
Capitalization68.49B
RF vs USB Comparison Chart
Loading...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RF vs. USB commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RF is a Hold and USB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (RF: $23.39 vs. USB: $45.87)
Brand notoriety: RF and USB are both notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RF: 111% vs. USB: 107%
Market capitalization -- RF: $18.9B vs. USB: $68.49B
RF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $18.9B. USB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $68.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUSB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • USB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the long-term than USB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • USB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USB is a better buy in the short-term than RF.

Price Growth

RF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.82% price change this week, while USB (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

RF is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

USB is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USB($68.5B) has a higher market cap than RF($18.9B). USB has higher P/E ratio than RF: USB (13.44) vs RF (9.74). RF YTD gains are higher at: -0.553 vs. USB (-4.098). RF has less debt than USB: RF (2.33B) vs USB (62.9B). USB has higher revenues than RF: USB (28B) vs RF (7.57B).
RFUSBRF / USB
Capitalization18.9B68.5B28%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.553-4.09813%
P/E Ratio9.7413.4472%
Revenue7.57B28B27%
Total Cash1.55BN/A-
Total Debt2.33B62.9B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RF vs USB: Fundamental Ratings
RF
USB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
758
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2888
SMR RATING
1..100
73
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5458
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1857
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

USB's Valuation (65) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RF (74). This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USB (88). This means that RF’s stock grew somewhat faster than USB’s over the last 12 months.

USB's SMR Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RF (7). This means that USB’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as USB (58). This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to USB’s over the last 12 months.

RF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USB (57). This means that RF’s stock grew somewhat faster than USB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RFUSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OCS21.410.10
+0.47%
Oculis Holding AG
IGC0.30N/A
-0.10%
IGC Pharma
SATS29.57-0.60
-1.99%
EchoStar Corp
RM34.27-1.06
-3.00%
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT Corp
CDW186.50-6.30
-3.27%
CDW Corp

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
-2.78%
HBAN - RF
87%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
CFG - RF
87%
Closely correlated
-2.82%
PNC - RF
85%
Closely correlated
-2.00%
ASB - RF
85%
Closely correlated
-2.63%
FNB - RF
85%
Closely correlated
-2.25%
More