Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFG vs VOT
RFG vs VOT Comparison
Open Charts RFG vs VOT
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF
Price$51.27
Change+$0.36 (+0.71%)
Volume$128
Net Assets292.88M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$297.19
Change+$3.09 (+1.05%)
Volume$100
Net Assets33.08B
RFG vs VOT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFG vs. VOT commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFG is a Hold and VOT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOT has more net assets: 33.1B vs. RFG (293M). VOT has a higher annual dividend yield than RFG: VOT (17.187) vs RFG (6.582). RFG was incepted earlier than VOT: RFG (20 years) vs VOT (19 years). VOT (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than RFG (0.35). RFG has a higher turnover VOT (21.00) vs VOT (21.00).
| RFG | VOT | RFG / VOT | |
| Gain YTD | 6.582 | 17.187 | 38% |
| Net Assets | 293M | 33.1B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.07 | 500% |
| Turnover | 77.00 | 21.00 | 367% |
| Yield | 0.44 | 0.62 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RFG | VOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 79% | 14 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFG has been closely correlated with BDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RFG jumps, then BDC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
VOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOT has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VOT jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOT | 100% | +1.02% | ||
| ARES - VOT | 79% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| TRMB - VOT | 79% Closely correlated | +1.48% | ||
| APO - VOT | 78% Closely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| CPAY - VOT | 76% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| HLT - VOT | 76% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||