Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFIMX vs WCMLX
RFIMX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts RFIMX vs WCMLX
Ranger Micro Cap Institutional
Price$7.34
Change-$0.04 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.64M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.81
Change-$0.14 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.33M
RFIMX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFIMX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFIMX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMLX has more cash in the bank: 44.3M vs. RFIMX (10.6M). RFIMX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . RFIMX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: RFIMX (7 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). RFIMX (2.20) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RFIMX (36.75). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFIMX: WCMLX (100000) vs RFIMX (250000). WCMLX (5.84) and RFIMX (5.58) have marching annual gain over last year. WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 14.25 vs. RFIMX (-41.98).
| RFIMX | WCMLX | RFIMX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.99 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 1.79 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.653 | 8.476 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 100000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6M | 44.3M | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.58 | 5.84 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.87 | 39.36 | -33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -41.98 | 14.25 | -295% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement