Ad is loading...
RFISX vs WCMNX
RFISX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts RFISX vs WCMNX
Ranger Small Cap Institutional
Price$16.46
Change+$0.31 (+1.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.43M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$11.12
Change+$0.26 (+2.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.35M
RFISX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFISX vs. WCMNX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFISX is a StrongBuy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMNX has more cash in the bank: 39.3M vs. RFISX (28.4M). RFISX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . RFISX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: RFISX (14 years) vs WCMNX (5 years). WCMNX (2.11) is less costly to investors than RFISX (1.63). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RFISX (35.55). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFISX: WCMNX (1000) vs RFISX (250000). RFISX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.92 vs. WCMNX (-11.06). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 23.83 vs. RFISX (12.86).
| RFISX | WCMNX | RFISX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.24 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 2.11 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.068 | -14.421 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.4M | 39.3M | 72% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.92 | -11.06 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.61 | -6.06 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.86 | 23.83 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers