Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFISX vs WCMNX
RFISX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts RFISX vs WCMNX
Ranger Small Cap Institutional
Price$17.49
Change+$0.18 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.39M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.14
Change+$0.13 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.98M
RFISX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFISX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFISX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMNX has more cash in the bank: 43M vs. RFISX (30.4M). RFISX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . RFISX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: RFISX (14 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than RFISX (1.63). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RFISX (35.55). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFISX: WCMNX (1000) vs RFISX (250000). RFISX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.23 vs. WCMNX (-1.48). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 12.35 vs. RFISX (-0.46).
| RFISX | WCMNX | RFISX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.24 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 2.04 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.681 | -5.359 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.4M | 43M | 71% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.23 | -1.48 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.76 | 9.78 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.46 | 12.35 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement