Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFISX vs WCMNX
RFISX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts RFISX vs WCMNX
Ranger Small Cap Institutional
Price$17.61
Change-$0.05 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.41M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.58
Change-$0.06 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.17M
RFISX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFISX vs. WCMNX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFISX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMNX has more cash in the bank: 45.2M vs. RFISX (21.4M). RFISX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . RFISX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: RFISX (14 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than RFISX (1.63). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RFISX (35.55). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFISX: WCMNX (1000) vs RFISX (250000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.65 vs. RFISX (0.80). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 21.79 vs. RFISX (-1.89).
| RFISX | WCMNX | RFISX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.24 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 2.04 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.029 | 7.486 | -40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.4M | 45.2M | 47% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.80 | 5.65 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.97 | 28.68 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.89 | 21.79 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement