Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFNBX vs VTSMX
RFNBX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts RFNBX vs VTSMX
American Funds Fundamental Invs R2
Price$85.53
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.4B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$143.62
Change+$1.51 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82T
RFNBX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RFNBX vs. VTSMX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RFNBX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.82T vs. RFNBX (146B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than RFNBX: VTSMX (1.18) vs RFNBX (0.30). RFNBX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: RFNBX (23 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). RFNBX (1.36) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). RFNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). RFNBX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: RFNBX (250) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.96 vs. RFNBX (7.66). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 80.94 vs. RFNBX (46.23).
| RFNBX | VTSMX | RFNBX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.14 | 971% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.14 | 971% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.897 | 0.817 | 845% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 3000 | 8% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 146B | 1.82T | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.18 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.66 | 10.96 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.03 | 40.34 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.23 | 80.94 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.01 | 179.94 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement