Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFRCX vs TRIZX
RFRCX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.36B vs. RFRCX (747M). TRIZX pays higher dividends than RFRCX: TRIZX (8.00) vs RFRCX (6.31). RFRCX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: RFRCX (20 years) vs TRIZX (6 years). RFRCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.61). RFRCX (80.00) and TRIZX (77.90) have comparable annual turnover. TRIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFRCX: TRIZX (0) vs RFRCX (2000). TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.23 vs. RFRCX (6.64). TRIZX return over 5 years is better than : 41.35 vs. RFRCX (27.39).
| RFRCX | TRIZX | RFRCX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.02 | 8,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.61 | 292% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.898 | 4.913 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 5000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 747M | 4.36B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.31 | 8.00 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | 8.23 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.16 | 31.83 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.39 | 41.35 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement