Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFRCX vs TRIZX
RFRCX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.34B vs. RFRCX (752M). TRIZX pays higher dividends than RFRCX: TRIZX (8.13) vs RFRCX (6.40). RFRCX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: RFRCX (19 years) vs TRIZX (5 years). RFRCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.62). RFRCX (80.00) and TRIZX (77.90) have comparable annual turnover. TRIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFRCX: TRIZX (0) vs RFRCX (2000). TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.26 vs. RFRCX (6.68). TRIZX return over 5 years is better than : 42.12 vs. RFRCX (29.77).
| RFRCX | TRIZX | RFRCX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.02 | 8,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.62 | 287% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.259 | 4.085 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 5000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 752M | 4.34B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.40 | 8.13 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.68 | 8.26 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.08 | 31.07 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.77 | 42.12 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement