Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RFRFX vs TRIZX
RFRFX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.34B vs. RFRFX (751M). TRIZX pays higher dividends than RFRFX: TRIZX (8.13) vs RFRFX (7.43). RFRFX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: RFRFX (17 years) vs TRIZX (5 years). RFRFX (0.76) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.62). RFRFX (80.00) and TRIZX (77.90) have comparable annual turnover. RFRFX (0) and TRIZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.03 vs. RFRFX (7.57). TRIZX return over 5 years is better than : 42.28 vs. RFRFX (37.08).
| RFRFX | TRIZX | RFRFX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.02 | 3,650% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.62 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.891 | 4.085 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 751M | 4.34B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.43 | 8.13 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.57 | 8.03 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.83 | 31.79 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.08 | 42.28 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement