Ad is loading...
RGABX vs RGACX
RGABX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$61.27
Change+$5.83 (+10.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.76B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$66.49
Change+$6.32 (+10.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.76B
RGABX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. RGACX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX (246B) and RGACX (246B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RGACX pays higher dividends than RGABX: RGACX (0.09) vs RGABX (0.00). RGABX was incepted earlier than RGACX: RGABX (23 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGABX (25.00) and RGACX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. RGABX (250) and RGACX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.54 vs. RGABX (-13.51). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.35 vs. RGABX (28.69).
| RGABX | RGACX | RGABX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.94 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.94 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.531 | -16.419 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 246B | 246B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.51 | -12.54 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.71 | -4.11 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.69 | 34.35 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.86 | 36.41 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...