Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs TRIRX
RGABX vs TRIRX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs TRIRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$78.66
Change+$0.63 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
Nuveen Large Cap Gr Idx Retire
Price$78.34
Change+$0.47 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.97B
RGABX vs TRIRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. TRIRX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Hold and TRIRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. TRIRX (18B). TRIRX pays higher dividends than RGABX: TRIRX (0.32) vs RGABX (0.00). RGABX was incepted earlier than TRIRX: RGABX (23 years) vs TRIRX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than TRIRX (0.30). TRIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). TRIRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: TRIRX (0) vs RGABX (250). TRIRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.88 vs. RGABX (16.10). TRIRX return over 5 years is better than : 81.16 vs. RGABX (41.02).
| RGABX | TRIRX | RGABX / TRIRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.30 | 463% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.30 | 463% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.428 | 15.192 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 18B | 1,889% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.10 | 23.88 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.76 | 79.10 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.02 | 81.16 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.04 | 275.38 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement