Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs TRIRX
RGABX vs TRIRX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs TRIRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$76.39
Change+$0.40 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Nuveen Large Cap Gr Idx Retire
Price$78.33
Change+$0.59 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.64B
RGABX vs TRIRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. TRIRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Hold and TRIRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. TRIRX (17.6B). TRIRX pays higher dividends than RGABX: TRIRX (0.30) vs RGABX (0.00). RGABX was incepted earlier than TRIRX: RGABX (24 years) vs TRIRX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than TRIRX (0.30). TRIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). TRIRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: TRIRX (0) vs RGABX (250). TRIRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.52 vs. RGABX (5.19). TRIRX return over 5 years is better than : 67.95 vs. RGABX (26.47).
| RGABX | TRIRX | RGABX / TRIRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.30 | 463% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.30 | 463% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.011 | 15.000 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 17.6B | 1,858% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.30 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.19 | 14.52 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.76 | 81.20 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.47 | 67.95 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.13 | 255.30 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement