Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs TRIRX
RGABX vs TRIRX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs TRIRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$79.04
Change-$0.12 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets343.07B
Nuveen Large Cap Gr Idx Retire
Price$80.10
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.46B
RGABX vs TRIRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. TRIRX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Buy and TRIRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. TRIRX (18.5B). TRIRX pays higher dividends than RGABX: TRIRX (0.31) vs RGABX (0.00). RGABX was incepted earlier than TRIRX: RGABX (23 years) vs TRIRX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than TRIRX (0.30). TRIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). TRIRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: TRIRX (0) vs RGABX (250). TRIRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. RGABX (11.95). TRIRX return over 5 years is better than : 74.01 vs. RGABX (33.99).
| RGABX | TRIRX | RGABX / TRIRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.30 | 463% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.30 | 463% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.000 | 18.565 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 18.5B | 1,854% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.95 | 22.46 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.27 | 100.08 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.99 | 74.01 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.06 | 282.43 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement