Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs UMLGX
RGABX vs UMLGX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs UMLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$76.49
Change+$0.17 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst
Price$7.64
Change-$0.05 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets661.34M
RGABX vs UMLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. UMLGX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Buy and UMLGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. UMLGX (661M). RGABX (0.00) and UMLGX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than UMLGX: RGABX (23 years) vs UMLGX (28 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than UMLGX (0.94). UMLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMLGX: RGABX (250) vs UMLGX (2000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.53 vs. UMLGX (-11.06). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 34.12 vs. UMLGX (-49.10).
| RGABX | UMLGX | RGABX / UMLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.80 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.94 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.161 | -12.486 | -121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 661M | 50,227% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.53 | -11.06 | -149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.24 | 5.09 | 1,066% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.12 | -49.10 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.61 | -56.24 | -149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers