Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs USLCX
RGABX vs USLCX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs USLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$75.99
Change-$0.53 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth C
Price$42.77
Change-$0.43 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.75B
RGABX vs USLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. USLCX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Hold and USLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. USLCX (1.75B). RGABX (0.00) and USLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than USLCX: RGABX (24 years) vs USLCX (24 years). USLCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). USLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than USLCX: RGABX (250) vs USLCX (1000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.42 vs. USLCX (-20.76). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 25.42 vs. USLCX (-19.78).
| RGABX | USLCX | RGABX / USLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.88 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.89 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.408 | -1.639 | -879% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 1.75B | 18,846% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | -20.76 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.94 | 18.10 | 309% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.42 | -19.78 | -129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.22 | 10.15 | 721% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement