Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs USLCX
RGABX vs USLCX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs USLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$78.57
Change-$0.51 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth C
Price$44.97
Change-$0.21 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
RGABX vs USLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. USLCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Buy and USLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. USLCX (2.04B). RGABX (0.00) and USLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than USLCX: RGABX (23 years) vs USLCX (23 years). USLCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). USLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than USLCX: RGABX (250) vs USLCX (1000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.25 vs. USLCX (-14.45). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 34.72 vs. USLCX (-13.07).
| RGABX | USLCX | RGABX / USLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.88 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.89 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.293 | 2.869 | 638% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 2.04B | 16,830% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.25 | -14.45 | -92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.35 | 31.18 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.72 | -13.07 | -266% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.25 | 20.42 | 427% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement