Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGABX vs ZVGNX
RGABX vs ZVGNX Comparison
Open Charts RGABX vs ZVGNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$76.49
Change+$0.17 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
Zevenbergen Genea Investor
Price$57.37
Change+$0.47 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.38M
RGABX vs ZVGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGABX vs. ZVGNX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGABX is a Buy and ZVGNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. ZVGNX (76.4M). RGABX (0.00) and ZVGNX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGABX was incepted earlier than ZVGNX: RGABX (23 years) vs ZVGNX (10 years). ZVGNX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVGNX (18.83). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVGNX: RGABX (250) vs ZVGNX (2500). ZVGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.24 vs. RGABX (16.53). ZVGNX return over 5 years is better than : 46.65 vs. RGABX (34.12).
| RGABX | ZVGNX | RGABX / ZVGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.30 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.62 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.161 | 16.558 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 76.4M | 434,555% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.53 | 45.24 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.24 | 114.95 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.12 | 46.65 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.61 | 484.81 | 17% |