Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SCATX
RGACX vs SCATX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SCATX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.12
Change+$0.43 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Gr Stk I
Price$62.79
Change+$0.96 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets475.4M
RGACX vs SCATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SCATX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and SCATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. SCATX (475M). RGACX pays higher dividends than SCATX: RGACX (0.07) vs SCATX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than SCATX: RGACX (24 years) vs SCATX (22 years). SCATX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. SCATX (13.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCATX: RGACX (250) vs SCATX (100000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.37 vs. SCATX (5.39). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.00 vs. SCATX (3.88).
| RGACX | SCATX | RGACX / SCATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.00 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.10 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.460 | 6.567 | 235% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 475M | 68,842% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 5.39 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.11 | 115.36 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.00 | 3.88 | 825% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.80 | 169.88 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement