Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SCATX
RGACX vs SCATX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SCATX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.45
Change-$0.56 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Gr Stk I
Price$66.60
Change-$0.42 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets525.77M
RGACX vs SCATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SCATX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and SCATX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. SCATX (526M). RGACX pays higher dividends than SCATX: RGACX (0.07) vs SCATX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than SCATX: RGACX (23 years) vs SCATX (22 years). SCATX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. SCATX (13.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCATX: RGACX (250) vs SCATX (100000). SCATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.75 vs. RGACX (14.51). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.62 vs. SCATX (17.39).
| RGACX | SCATX | RGACX / SCATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.00 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.10 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.697 | 15.512 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 526M | 65,209% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.51 | 27.75 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.98 | 128.50 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.62 | 17.39 | 234% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.82 | 205.47 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers