Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs SCATX
RGACX vs SCATX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs SCATX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.52
Change+$0.13 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Gr Stk I
Price$64.62
Change+$0.23 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets509.44M
RGACX vs SCATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. SCATX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and SCATX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. SCATX (509M). RGACX pays higher dividends than SCATX: RGACX (0.07) vs SCATX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than SCATX: RGACX (23 years) vs SCATX (22 years). SCATX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. SCATX (13.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCATX: RGACX (250) vs SCATX (100000). SCATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.53 vs. RGACX (13.58). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.89 vs. SCATX (21.65).
| RGACX | SCATX | RGACX / SCATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.00 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.10 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.627 | 10.979 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 509M | 64,440% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.58 | 27.53 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.11 | 92.32 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.89 | 21.65 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.83 | 184.41 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement