Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs STCAX
RGACX vs STCAX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs STCAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.16
Change-$0.04 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.41B
Virtus Silvant Large-Cap Growth Stk I
Price$17.37
Change+$0.05 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets249.37M
RGACX vs STCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. STCAX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and STCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. STCAX (249M). RGACX pays higher dividends than STCAX: RGACX (0.07) vs STCAX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than STCAX: RGACX (23 years) vs STCAX (33 years). STCAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. STCAX (12.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than STCAX: RGACX (250) vs STCAX (100000). STCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.10 vs. RGACX (16.51). STCAX return over 5 years is better than : 80.42 vs. RGACX (42.05).
| RGACX | STCAX | RGACX / STCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.77 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.06 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.127 | 11.886 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 249M | 132,129% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.51 | 23.10 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.20 | 76.55 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.05 | 80.42 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.17 | 59.93 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement