Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TBCIX
RGACX vs TBCIX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TBCIX
RGACX vs TBCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TBCIX commentary
Jun 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and TBCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. TBCIX (62.8B). RGACX (0.00) and TBCIX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than TBCIX: RGACX (24 years) vs TBCIX (11 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than TBCIX (0.57). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TBCIX (18.30). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBCIX: RGACX (250) vs TBCIX (500000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.44 vs. TBCIX (3.77). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.47 vs. TBCIX (11.06).
| RGACX | TBCIX | RGACX / TBCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.57 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.57 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.585 | -2.543 | -259% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 62.8B | 575% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 3.77 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.36 | 50.04 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.47 | 11.06 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.12 | 211.54 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement