Ad is loading...
RGACX vs TBDCX
RGACX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$70.07
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$11.14
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets346.38M
RGACX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TBDCX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a StrongBuy and TBDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. TBDCX (346M). RGACX pays higher dividends than TBDCX: RGACX (0.08) vs TBDCX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: RGACX (23 years) vs TBDCX (26 years). TBDCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: RGACX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.58 vs. TBDCX (-10.52). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.87 vs. TBDCX (-0.71).
| RGACX | TBDCX | RGACX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.90 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.96 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.667 | -5.111 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 346M | 82,370% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.58 | -10.52 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.70 | 35.03 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.87 | -0.71 | -5,873% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.36 | 8.05 | 725% |