Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TWCCX
RGACX vs TWCCX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TWCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.04
Change+$0.52 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
American Century Ultra® C
Price$66.78
Change+$0.40 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.16B
RGACX vs TWCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TWCCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and TWCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. TWCCX (26.2B). RGACX pays higher dividends than TWCCX: RGACX (0.07) vs TWCCX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than TWCCX: RGACX (23 years) vs TWCCX (24 years). TWCCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TWCCX (7.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWCCX: RGACX (250) vs TWCCX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.23 vs. TWCCX (9.11). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 35.74 vs. TWCCX (18.28).
| RGACX | TWCCX | RGACX / TWCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.87 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.92 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.349 | 6.123 | 251% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 26.2B | 1,252% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.23 | 9.11 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.12 | 35.80 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.74 | 18.28 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.87 | 116.36 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement