Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs TWCUX
RGACX vs TWCUX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs TWCUX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
American Century Ultra® I
Price$99.44
Change-$0.22 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.45B
RGACX vs TWCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. TWCUX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and TWCUX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. TWCUX (26.4B). RGACX pays higher dividends than TWCUX: RGACX (0.07) vs TWCUX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than TWCUX: RGACX (23 years) vs TWCUX (44 years). RGACX (0.94) and TWCUX (0.92) have similar cost to investors . RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TWCUX (7.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWCUX: RGACX (250) vs TWCUX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. TWCUX (11.92). TWCUX return over 5 years is better than : 48.29 vs. RGACX (41.95).
| RGACX | TWCUX | RGACX / TWCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.89 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.92 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.044 | 6.558 | 214% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 26.4B | 1,246% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.08 | 11.92 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.19 | 37.18 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.95 | 48.29 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.68 | 162.54 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement