Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs USLCX
RGACX vs USLCX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs USLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.69
Change-$0.58 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth C
Price$42.77
Change-$0.43 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.75B
RGACX vs USLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. USLCX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and USLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. USLCX (1.75B). RGACX pays higher dividends than USLCX: RGACX (0.07) vs USLCX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than USLCX: RGACX (24 years) vs USLCX (24 years). USLCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). USLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than USLCX: RGACX (250) vs USLCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.60 vs. USLCX (-20.76). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.90 vs. USLCX (-19.78).
| RGACX | USLCX | RGACX / USLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.88 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.89 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.863 | -1.639 | -907% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 1.75B | 18,846% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.60 | -20.76 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.28 | 18.10 | 333% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.90 | -19.78 | -156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.84 | 10.15 | 836% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement