Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs VVPLX
RGACX vs VVPLX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs VVPLX
RGACX vs VVPLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. VVPLX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and VVPLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. VVPLX (223M). VVPLX pays higher dividends than RGACX: VVPLX (1.43) vs RGACX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than VVPLX: RGACX (24 years) vs VVPLX (17 years). VVPLX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). VVPLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than VVPLX: RGACX (250) vs VVPLX (5000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.42 vs. VVPLX (-3.95). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.37 vs. VVPLX (-10.82).
| RGACX | VVPLX | RGACX / VVPLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.10 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.19 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.695 | -1.392 | -553% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 223M | 161,883% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | -3.95 | -137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.34 | 34.90 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.37 | -10.82 | -124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.88 | 77.44 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement