Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs VZGRX
RGACX vs VZGRX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs VZGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Gr Stk R6
Price$64.49
Change+$0.33 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets510.54M
RGACX vs VZGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. VZGRX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and VZGRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. VZGRX (511M). RGACX pays higher dividends than VZGRX: RGACX (0.07) vs VZGRX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than VZGRX: RGACX (23 years) vs VZGRX (5 years). VZGRX (0.99) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VZGRX (13.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than VZGRX: RGACX (250) vs VZGRX (2500000). VZGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.53 vs. RGACX (14.08).
| RGACX | VZGRX | RGACX / VZGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.90 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.99 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.044 | 10.127 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 511M | 64,384% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.08 | 27.53 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.19 | 74.25 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.95 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement