Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs VZGRX
RGACX vs VZGRX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs VZGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.25
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Gr Stk R6
Price$66.32
Change-$0.08 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets522.09M
RGACX vs VZGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. VZGRX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and VZGRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. VZGRX (522M). RGACX pays higher dividends than VZGRX: RGACX (0.07) vs VZGRX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than VZGRX: RGACX (23 years) vs VZGRX (5 years). VZGRX (0.99) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VZGRX (13.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than VZGRX: RGACX (250) vs VZGRX (2500000). VZGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.51 vs. RGACX (16.97).
| RGACX | VZGRX | RGACX / VZGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.90 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.99 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.419 | 13.972 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 522M | 65,134% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.97 | 29.51 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.65 | 102.32 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.16 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement