Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs ZVGIX
RGACX vs ZVGIX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs ZVGIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Zevenbergen Genea Institutional
Price$58.61
Change+$0.37 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.76M
RGACX vs ZVGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. ZVGIX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and ZVGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. ZVGIX (74.8M). RGACX pays higher dividends than ZVGIX: RGACX (0.07) vs ZVGIX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than ZVGIX: RGACX (23 years) vs ZVGIX (10 years). ZVGIX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVGIX (18.83). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVGIX: RGACX (250) vs ZVGIX (50000). ZVGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.29 vs. RGACX (14.08). ZVGIX return over 5 years is better than : 55.47 vs. RGACX (41.95).
| RGACX | ZVGIX | RGACX / ZVGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.00 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.32 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.044 | 15.372 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 74.8M | 439,840% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.08 | 41.29 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.19 | 78.43 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.95 | 55.47 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement