Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs ZVGIX
RGACX vs ZVGIX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs ZVGIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
Zevenbergen Genea Institutional
Price$58.96
Change+$0.48 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.52M
RGACX vs ZVGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. ZVGIX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and ZVGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. ZVGIX (75.5M). RGACX pays higher dividends than ZVGIX: RGACX (0.07) vs ZVGIX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than ZVGIX: RGACX (23 years) vs ZVGIX (10 years). ZVGIX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVGIX (18.83). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVGIX: RGACX (250) vs ZVGIX (50000). ZVGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.65 vs. RGACX (17.83). ZVGIX return over 5 years is better than : 48.85 vs. RGACX (40.02).
| RGACX | ZVGIX | RGACX / ZVGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.00 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.32 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.516 | 16.799 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 75.5M | 439,735% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.83 | 45.65 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.53 | 116.92 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | 48.85 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.93 | 501.02 | 19% |