Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs ZVGIX
RGACX vs ZVGIX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs ZVGIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.01
Change+$0.47 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
Zevenbergen Genea Institutional
Price$62.92
Change+$0.77 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.07M
RGACX vs ZVGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. ZVGIX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and ZVGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. ZVGIX (79.1M). RGACX pays higher dividends than ZVGIX: RGACX (0.07) vs ZVGIX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than ZVGIX: RGACX (23 years) vs ZVGIX (10 years). ZVGIX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVGIX (18.83). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVGIX: RGACX (250) vs ZVGIX (50000). ZVGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.35 vs. RGACX (14.27). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.40 vs. ZVGIX (35.26).
| RGACX | ZVGIX | RGACX / ZVGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.00 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.32 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.475 | 23.118 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 79.1M | 431,100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.27 | 41.35 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.11 | 145.17 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.40 | 35.26 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.13 | 510.51 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement