Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs WPCSX
RGAGX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$84.34
Change+$0.79 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.16B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$49.06
Change+$0.24 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets747.67M
RGAGX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. WPCSX commentary
Jul 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a StrongBuy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. WPCSX (748M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: RGAGX (0.61) vs WPCSX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: RGAGX (16 years) vs WPCSX (11 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: RGAGX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.39 vs. WPCSX (-3.25). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 50.33 vs. WPCSX (18.75).
| RGAGX | WPCSX | RGAGX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.75 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.75 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.132 | 6.223 | 211% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 324B | 748M | 43,316% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.39 | -3.25 | -412% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.44 | 16.96 | 333% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.33 | 18.75 | 268% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.65 | 70.28 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement