Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs WPCSX
RGAGX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$88.62
Change+$0.63 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$49.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets729.93M
RGAGX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. WPCSX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. WPCSX (730M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: RGAGX (0.59) vs WPCSX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: RGAGX (16 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: RGAGX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.34 vs. WPCSX (-6.65). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 51.08 vs. WPCSX (12.90).
| RGAGX | WPCSX | RGAGX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.75 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.75 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.028 | 6.614 | 273% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 730M | 46,301% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.34 | -6.65 | -276% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.44 | 20.45 | 300% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.08 | 12.90 | 396% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.29 | 78.51 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement