Ad is loading...
RGAGX vs WPCSX
RGAGX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$72.73
Change-$0.09 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.87B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$46.17
Change-$0.10 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets722.35M
RGAGX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. WPCSX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a StrongBuy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 286B vs. WPCSX (722M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: RGAGX (0.70) vs WPCSX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: RGAGX (16 years) vs WPCSX (11 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: RGAGX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.52 vs. WPCSX (-6.07). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.07 vs. WPCSX (21.06).
| RGAGX | WPCSX | RGAGX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.75 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.75 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.441 | 0.675 | -362% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 286B | 722M | 39,612% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.52 | -6.07 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.10 | 12.74 | 268% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.07 | 21.06 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.91 | 64.78 | 99% |