Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs ZVGNX
RGAGX vs ZVGNX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs ZVGNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.49
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
Zevenbergen Genea Investor
Price$57.37
Change+$0.47 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.38M
RGAGX vs ZVGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. ZVGNX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and ZVGNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. ZVGNX (76.4M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than ZVGNX: RGAGX (0.59) vs ZVGNX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than ZVGNX: RGAGX (16 years) vs ZVGNX (10 years). ZVGNX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVGNX (18.83). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVGNX: RGAGX (250) vs ZVGNX (2500). ZVGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.24 vs. RGAGX (18.90). ZVGNX return over 5 years is better than : 46.65 vs. RGAGX (44.13).
| RGAGX | ZVGNX | RGAGX / ZVGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.30 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.62 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.016 | 16.558 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 76.4M | 434,555% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.90 | 45.24 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.40 | 114.95 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.13 | 46.65 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.81 | 484.81 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement