Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs ZVGNX
RGAGX vs ZVGNX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs ZVGNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$85.36
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Zevenbergen Genea Investor
Price$57.04
Change+$0.36 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.76M
RGAGX vs ZVGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. ZVGNX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and ZVGNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. ZVGNX (74.8M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than ZVGNX: RGAGX (0.60) vs ZVGNX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than ZVGNX: RGAGX (16 years) vs ZVGNX (10 years). ZVGNX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVGNX (18.83). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVGNX: RGAGX (250) vs ZVGNX (2500). ZVGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.89 vs. RGAGX (15.11). ZVGNX return over 5 years is better than : 53.15 vs. RGAGX (46.14).
| RGAGX | ZVGNX | RGAGX / ZVGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.30 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.62 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.500 | 15.156 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 74.8M | 439,840% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.11 | 40.89 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.78 | 76.85 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.14 | 53.15 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement