Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs STCZX
RGAHX vs STCZX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs STCZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$86.86
Change-$0.42 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
Virtus Silvant Large-Cap Growth Stk R6
Price$18.01
Change-$0.06 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.66M
RGAHX vs STCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. STCZX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Buy and STCZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. STCZX (256M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than STCZX: RGAHX (0.46) vs STCZX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than STCZX: RGAHX (10 years) vs STCZX (11 years). STCZX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. STCZX (12.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than STCZX: RGAHX (250) vs STCZX (2500000). STCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.18 vs. RGAHX (16.91). STCZX return over 5 years is better than : 90.01 vs. RGAHX (49.05).
| RGAHX | STCZX | RGAHX / STCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.72 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.92 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.273 | 14.730 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 256M | 132,813% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.91 | 23.18 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.96 | 108.18 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.05 | 90.01 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 75.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement