Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs TBDCX
RGAHX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs TBDCX
RGAHX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. TBDCX commentary
Jul 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Hold and TBDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. TBDCX (445M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than TBDCX: RGAHX (0.39) vs TBDCX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: RGAHX (11 years) vs TBDCX (27 years). TBDCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: RGAHX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.40 vs. TBDCX (5.34). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 18.83 vs. TBDCX (-8.32).
| RGAHX | TBDCX | RGAHX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.81 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.87 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.503 | 4.259 | 223% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 445M | 81,124% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.40 | 5.34 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.55 | 32.46 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.83 | -8.32 | -226% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.30 | 44.96 | 252% |