Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs TBDCX
RGAHX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$87.28
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$13.39
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets431.13M
RGAHX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. TBDCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Buy and TBDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. TBDCX (431M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than TBDCX: RGAHX (0.46) vs TBDCX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: RGAHX (10 years) vs TBDCX (26 years). TBDCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: RGAHX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.72 vs. TBDCX (1.28). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 49.22 vs. TBDCX (-2.62).
| RGAHX | TBDCX | RGAHX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.90 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.96 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.845 | 14.140 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 431M | 78,886% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.72 | 1.28 | 1,379% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.74 | 64.82 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.22 | -2.62 | -1,881% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 38.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement