Ad is loading...
RGAHX vs TBDCX
RGAHX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$71.62
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$11.14
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets346.38M
RGAHX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. TBDCX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a StrongBuy and TBDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. TBDCX (346M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than TBDCX: RGAHX (0.54) vs TBDCX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: RGAHX (9 years) vs TBDCX (26 years). TBDCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: RGAHX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.25 vs. TBDCX (-10.52). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.87 vs. TBDCX (-0.71).
| RGAHX | TBDCX | RGAHX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.90 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.96 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.478 | -5.111 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 346M | 82,370% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.25 | -10.52 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.40 | 35.03 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.87 | -0.71 | -6,293% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 8.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...