Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs WLGRX
RGAHX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs WLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$88.17
Change+$0.65 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund R
Price$36.41
Change+$0.23 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.04B
RGAHX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. WLGRX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Buy and WLGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. WLGRX (8.04B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than WLGRX: RGAHX (0.45) vs WLGRX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: RGAHX (10 years) vs WLGRX (20 years). WLGRX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGRX (18.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: WLGRX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.91 vs. WLGRX (10.17). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 42.99 vs. WLGRX (30.38).
| RGAHX | WLGRX | RGAHX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.14 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.24 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.057 | 8.681 | 231% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 8.04B | 4,242% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.91 | 10.17 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.57 | 60.30 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.99 | 30.38 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement