Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs UCNQX
RGEBX vs UCNQX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs UCNQX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$82.44
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
Victory Nasdaq 100 Index C
Price$56.18
Change+$0.52 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.8B
RGEBX vs UCNQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. UCNQX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Buy and UCNQX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. UCNQX (7.8B). RGEBX (0.00) and UCNQX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than UCNQX: RGEBX (11 years) vs UCNQX (5 years). UCNQX (1.61) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. UCNQX (22.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than UCNQX: RGEBX (250) vs UCNQX (2500). UCNQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.89 vs. RGEBX (17.32). UCNQX return over 5 years is better than : 73.03 vs. RGEBX (38.39).
| RGEBX | UCNQX | RGEBX / UCNQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.45 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.61 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.132 | 11.979 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 7.8B | 4,254% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.32 | 21.89 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.24 | 79.33 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.39 | 73.03 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.00 | N/A | - |