Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WLGCX
RGEBX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$80.26
Change+$0.70 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.41B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund C
Price$25.68
Change+$0.19 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.07B
RGEBX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WLGCX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Hold and WLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 322B vs. WLGCX (8.07B). RGEBX (0.00) and WLGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: RGEBX (11 years) vs WLGCX (25 years). WLGCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGCX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: RGEBX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.90 vs. WLGCX (15.16). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.18 vs. WLGCX (18.29).
| RGEBX | WLGCX | RGEBX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.64 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.74 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.346 | 5.592 | 221% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 322B | 8.07B | 3,992% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.90 | 15.16 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.68 | 23.46 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.18 | 18.29 | 214% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.71 | 50.26 | 157% |