Ad is loading...
RGEBX vs WLGCX
RGEBX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$66.80
Change-$2.49 (-3.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.57B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund C
Price$23.32
Change+$0.06 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.09B
RGEBX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WLGCX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a StrongBuy and WLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 287B vs. WLGCX (8.09B). RGEBX (0.00) and WLGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: RGEBX (11 years) vs WLGCX (25 years). WLGCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGCX (9.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: RGEBX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). WLGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.92 vs. RGEBX (2.45). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.67 vs. WLGCX (31.08).
| RGEBX | WLGCX | RGEBX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.64 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.74 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.010 | -4.112 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287B | 8.09B | 3,546% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.45 | 6.92 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.38 | 13.98 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.67 | 31.08 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.12 | 39.47 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...