Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WSACX
RGEBX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$80.26
Change+$0.70 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$29.73
Change+$0.24 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.63M
RGEBX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WSACX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Hold and WSACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. WSACX (62.6M). WSACX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: WSACX (0.06) vs RGEBX (0.00). RGEBX was incepted earlier than WSACX: RGEBX (11 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: RGEBX (250) vs WSACX (5000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.90 vs. WSACX (16.41). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.18 vs. WSACX (24.31).
| RGEBX | WSACX | RGEBX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.34 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.34 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.346 | 6.194 | 199% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 62.6M | 519,169% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.90 | 16.41 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.68 | 17.55 | 249% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.18 | 24.31 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.71 | 25.77 | 305% |