Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WSACX
RGEBX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$84.70
Change-$0.55 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$32.37
Change-$0.23 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.52M
RGEBX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WSACX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Buy and WSACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. WSACX (68.5M). WSACX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: WSACX (0.06) vs RGEBX (0.00). RGEBX was incepted earlier than WSACX: RGEBX (11 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: RGEBX (250) vs WSACX (5000). WSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.17 vs. RGEBX (14.27). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.33 vs. WSACX (33.36).
| RGEBX | WSACX | RGEBX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.34 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.34 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.561 | 17.393 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 68.5M | 500,730% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.27 | 17.17 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.01 | 40.10 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.33 | 33.36 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.24 | 40.46 | 235% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement