Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WSACX
RGEBX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$84.10
Change-$0.41 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$31.26
Change+$0.04 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.53M
RGEBX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WSACX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Buy and WSACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. WSACX (65.5M). WSACX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: WSACX (0.06) vs RGEBX (0.00). RGEBX was incepted earlier than WSACX: RGEBX (11 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: RGEBX (250) vs WSACX (5000). RGEBX (15.90) and WSACX (15.53) have marching annual gain over last year. RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.66 vs. WSACX (32.04).
| RGEBX | WSACX | RGEBX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.34 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.34 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.721 | 12.423 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 65.5M | 519,084% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.90 | 15.53 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.93 | 28.60 | 210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.66 | 32.04 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.34 | 39.01 | 244% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement