Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WSACX
RGEBX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.95
Change-$0.57 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$31.81
Change-$0.26 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.19M
RGEBX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WSACX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Hold and WSACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. WSACX (67.2M). WSACX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: WSACX (0.06) vs RGEBX (0.00). RGEBX was incepted earlier than WSACX: RGEBX (11 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: RGEBX (250) vs WSACX (5000). WSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.90 vs. RGEBX (6.39). RGEBX (29.69) and WSACX (29.60) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RGEBX | WSACX | RGEBX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.34 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.34 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.712 | 14.548 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 67.2M | 491,071% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.39 | 8.90 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.35 | 32.32 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.69 | 29.60 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.59 | 37.11 | 217% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement