Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGLCX vs RGTFX
RGLCX vs RGTFX Comparison
Open Charts RGLCX vs RGTFX
American Funds Global Growth Port R3
Price$26.28
Change+$0.07 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.96B
American Funds Global Growth Port R5E
Price$26.53
Change+$0.08 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.96B
RGLCX vs RGTFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGLCX vs. RGTFX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGLCX is a Hold and RGTFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGLCX (6.96B) and RGTFX (6.96B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RGTFX pays higher dividends than RGLCX: RGTFX (0.77) vs RGLCX (0.35). RGLCX was incepted earlier than RGTFX: RGLCX (13 years) vs RGTFX (10 years). RGLCX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RGTFX (0.59). RGLCX (250) and RGTFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGTFX (11.48) and RGLCX (10.98) have marching annual gain over last year. RGTFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.24 vs. RGLCX (42.94).
| RGLCX | RGTFX | RGLCX / RGTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.59 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.59 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.218 | 17.608 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.96B | 6.96B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.77 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.98 | 11.48 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.72 | 62.30 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.94 | 45.24 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement