RGLD
Price
$152.75
Change
+$0.82 (+0.54%)
Updated
Jul 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8B
8 days until earnings call
USHAF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
6.07M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RGLD vs USHAF

Header iconRGLD vs USHAF Comparison
Open Charts RGLD vs USHAFBanner chart's image
Royal Gold
Price$152.75
Change+$0.82 (+0.54%)
Volume$22.87K
Capitalization8B
USHA RES
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.05K
Capitalization6.07M
RGLD vs USHAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USHAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RGLD vs. USHAF commentary
Jul 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGLD is a Buy and USHAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 30, 2025
Stock price -- (RGLD: $151.93 vs. USHAF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: RGLD and USHAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RGLD: 90% vs. USHAF: 3%
Market capitalization -- RGLD: $8B vs. USHAF: $6.07M
RGLD [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8B. USHAF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $6.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RGLD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSHAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RGLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USHAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGLD is a better buy in the long-term than USHAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RGLD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USHAF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RGLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • USHAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USHAF is a better buy in the short-term than RGLD.

Price Growth

RGLD (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.52% price change this week, while USHAF (@Precious Metals) price change was -14.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +49.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

RGLD is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGLD($8B) has a higher market cap than USHAF($6.07M). RGLD YTD gains are higher at: 16.220 vs. USHAF (-29.577). RGLD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 478M vs. USHAF (-2.34M). RGLD has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. USHAF (1.02M). RGLD has higher revenues than USHAF: RGLD (606M) vs USHAF (0).
RGLDUSHAFRGLD / USHAF
Capitalization8B6.07M131,742%
EBITDA478M-2.34M-20,459%
Gain YTD16.220-29.577-55%
P/E Ratio33.74N/A-
Revenue606M0-
Total Cash104M1.02M10,166%
Total Debt246MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RGLD: Fundamental Ratings
RGLD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
52
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57
SMR RATING
1..100
59
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RGLDUSHAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USHAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TBDAX20.62N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth A
FSGAX49.64N/A
N/A
Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Adv
RPMVX17.93N/A
N/A
Reinhart Mid Cap PMV Adv
DESIX11.05N/A
N/A
DFA Em Mkts Sustnby Cor 1 Instl
VSMAX118.19N/A
N/A
Vanguard Small Cap Index Admiral Shares

RGLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGLD has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RGLD jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGLD
1D Price
Change %
RGLD100%
-1.97%
WPM - RGLD
82%
Closely correlated
-2.39%
AEM - RGLD
81%
Closely correlated
-2.45%
AGI - RGLD
77%
Closely correlated
-2.09%
FNV - RGLD
76%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
EGO - RGLD
73%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
More

USHAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that USHAF and KOOYF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USHAF and KOOYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USHAF
1D Price
Change %
USHAF100%
N/A
KOOYF - USHAF
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.58%
RGLD - USHAF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.97%
MEXGF - USHAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADYRF - USHAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMDMF - USHAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More