RGS
Price
$28.47
Change
+$0.02 (+0.07%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
72.08M
TNL
Price
$61.08
Change
-$0.57 (-0.92%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.01B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RGS vs TNL

Header iconRGS vs TNL Comparison
Open Charts RGS vs TNLBanner chart's image
Regis
Price$28.47
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
Volume$100
Capitalization72.08M
Travel + Leisure
Price$61.08
Change-$0.57 (-0.92%)
Volume$8.55K
Capitalization4.01B
RGS vs TNL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RGS vs. TNL commentary
Sep 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGS is a StrongBuy and TNL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 17, 2025
Stock price -- (RGS: $28.45 vs. TNL: $61.65)
Brand notoriety: RGS and TNL are both not notable
RGS represents the Personnel Services, while TNL is part of the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RGS: 162% vs. TNL: 75%
Market capitalization -- RGS: $72.08M vs. TNL: $4.01B
RGS [@Personnel Services] is valued at $72.08M. TNL’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $4.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.35B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $180.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.77B. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTNL’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • RGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TNL’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, TNL is a better buy in the long-term than RGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RGS’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RGS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TNL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGS is a better buy in the short-term than TNL.

Price Growth

RGS (@Personnel Services) experienced а +6.59% price change this week, while TNL (@Consumer Sundries) price change was -0.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +230.02%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +41.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

TNL is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (-0.53% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

@Consumer Sundries (-0.69% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNL($4.01B) has a higher market cap than RGS($72.1M). TNL has higher P/E ratio than RGS: TNL (10.72) vs RGS (0.65). TNL YTD gains are higher at: 26.154 vs. RGS (19.941). TNL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 898M vs. RGS (24.8M). RGS has less debt than TNL: RGS (351M) vs TNL (5.59B). TNL has higher revenues than RGS: TNL (3.92B) vs RGS (210M).
RGSTNLRGS / TNL
Capitalization72.1M4.01B2%
EBITDA24.8M898M3%
Gain YTD19.94126.15476%
P/E Ratio0.6510.726%
Revenue210M3.92B5%
Total Cash17MN/A-
Total Debt351M5.59B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RGS vs TNL: Fundamental Ratings
RGS
TNL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2675
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10031
SMR RATING
1..100
133
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3742
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4117
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TNL's Valuation (20) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGS (84) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGS’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGS (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew significantly faster than RGS’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's SMR Rating (3) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as RGS (13) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.

RGS's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as TNL (42) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew similarly to TNL’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as RGS (41) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RGSTNL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UIIFX32.71N/A
N/A
Victory International Institutional
HAOSX16.35N/A
N/A
Harbor International Core Institutional
FMXSX8.44N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Max-Cap Index Svc
GEORX7.35N/A
N/A
Pear Tree Essex Environmental Opps R6
JRAIX98.77-0.18
-0.18%
Janus Henderson Research I

RGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGS and TRIP have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGS and TRIP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGS
1D Price
Change %
RGS100%
-3.85%
TRIP - RGS
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.24%
BKNG - RGS
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
CSV - RGS
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
RCL - RGS
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.45%
TNL - RGS
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TNL has been closely correlated with CCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TNL jumps, then CCL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNL
1D Price
Change %
TNL100%
N/A
CCL - TNL
71%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
CUK - TNL
70%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
RCL - TNL
70%
Closely correlated
-2.45%
VIK - TNL
69%
Closely correlated
-1.28%
NCLH - TNL
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.65%
More