RGS
Price
$23.18
Change
+$0.85 (+3.81%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
17.1M
TRIP
Price
$17.50
Change
+$2.51 (+16.74%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.83B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RGS vs TRIP

Header iconRGS vs TRIP Comparison
Open Charts RGS vs TRIPBanner chart's image
Regis
Price$23.18
Change+$0.85 (+3.81%)
Volume$8.27K
Capitalization17.1M
TripAdvisor
Price$17.50
Change+$2.51 (+16.74%)
Volume$14.37M
Capitalization3.83B
RGS vs TRIP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRIP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RGS vs. TRIP commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGS is a StrongBuy and TRIP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (RGS: $23.17 vs. TRIP: $17.50)
Brand notoriety: RGS and TRIP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RGS: 76% vs. TRIP: 374%
Market capitalization -- RGS: $17.1M vs. TRIP: $3.83B
RGS [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $17.1M. TRIP’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $3.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $10.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRIP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRIP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGS is a better buy in the long-term than TRIP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RGS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRIP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TRIP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGS is a better buy in the short-term than TRIP.

Price Growth

RGS (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а +5.63% price change this week, while TRIP (@Other Consumer Services) price change was +35.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +3.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

RGS is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

TRIP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (+3.72% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIP($3.83B) has a higher market cap than RGS($17.1M). TRIP YTD gains are higher at: 18.483 vs. RGS (-2.298). TRIP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 256M vs. RGS (22.2M). TRIP has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. RGS (7.15M). RGS has less debt than TRIP: RGS (525M) vs TRIP (912M). TRIP has higher revenues than RGS: TRIP (1.79B) vs RGS (216M).
RGSTRIPRGS / TRIP
Capitalization17.1M3.83B0%
EBITDA22.2M256M9%
Gain YTD-2.29818.483-12%
P/E RatioN/A395.29-
Revenue216M1.79B12%
Total Cash7.15M1.07B1%
Total Debt525M912M58%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RGS vs TRIP: Fundamental Ratings
RGS
TRIP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1632
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
878
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5697
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
20n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TRIP's Valuation (67) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as RGS (86). This means that TRIP’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.

TRIP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as RGS (100). This means that TRIP’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.

RGS's SMR Rating (8) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRIP (78). This means that RGS’s stock grew significantly faster than TRIP’s over the last 12 months.

TRIP's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as RGS (47). This means that TRIP’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.

RGS's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRIP (97). This means that RGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRIP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RGSTRIP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRIP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSUAX41.050.49
+1.21%
Rational Dynamic Brands A
FSSNX28.130.28
+1.01%
Fidelity Small Cap Index
JSCZX16.460.14
+0.86%
JPMorgan US Small Company R2
PAGYX21.530.12
+0.56%
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr Y
IMRFX14.600.06
+0.41%
Columbia Global Opportunities A

RGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGS and TRIP have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGS and TRIP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGS
1D Price
Change %
RGS100%
+3.83%
TRIP - RGS
25%
Poorly correlated
+16.74%
CSV - RGS
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
BKNG - RGS
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
MED - RGS
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
CCL - RGS
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
More