Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSAX vs SFCWX
RGSAX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts RGSAX vs SFCWX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap A
Price$32.95
Change-$0.05 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.04M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$76.67
Change-$0.44 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.56B
RGSAX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSAX vs. SFCWX commentary
Oct 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSAX is a Hold and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 81.6B vs. RGSAX (41M). RGSAX pays higher dividends than SFCWX: RGSAX (1.10) vs SFCWX (0.90). RGSAX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: RGSAX (24 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). RGSAX (1.60) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). SFCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSAX (25.00). RGSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: RGSAX (2500) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.65 vs. RGSAX (-11.78). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 10.51 vs. RGSAX (-19.68).
| RGSAX | SFCWX | RGSAX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.65 | 246% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.65 | 246% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.758 | 11.361 | 15% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41M | 81.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.90 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.78 | 6.65 | -177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.26 | 44.29 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.68 | 10.51 | -187% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement