Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs RSLDX
RGSCX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs RSLDX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$23.99
Change+$0.24 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.6M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$72.75
Change+$0.93 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.91B
RGSCX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. RSLDX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a StrongBuy and RSLDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 76.9B vs. RGSCX (44.6M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than RSLDX: RGSCX (1.45) vs RSLDX (0.82). RGSCX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: RGSCX (23 years) vs RSLDX (10 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). RSLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: RSLDX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). RSLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.54 vs. RGSCX (-1.14). RSLDX return over 5 years is better than : 24.56 vs. RGSCX (-15.96).
| RGSCX | RSLDX | RGSCX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 0.80 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.80 | 299% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.027 | 6.878 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.6M | 76.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 0.82 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.14 | 9.54 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.05 | 30.14 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.96 | 24.56 | -65% |
| Returns for 10 years | -40.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement