Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs RSLDX
RGSCX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs RSLDX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$24.31
Change+$0.21 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.94M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$73.88
Change+$0.77 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.16B
RGSCX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. RSLDX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Buy and RSLDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 78.2B vs. RGSCX (44.9M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than RSLDX: RGSCX (1.43) vs RSLDX (0.81). RGSCX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: RGSCX (23 years) vs RSLDX (10 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). RSLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: RSLDX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). RSLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.12 vs. RGSCX (-6.51). RSLDX return over 5 years is better than : 20.01 vs. RGSCX (-18.72).
| RGSCX | RSLDX | RGSCX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 0.80 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.80 | 299% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.589 | 8.539 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.9M | 78.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.81 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.51 | 6.12 | -106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.90 | 35.23 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.72 | 20.01 | -94% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement