Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs RSLFX
RGSCX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs RSLFX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$23.04
Change+$0.06 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.77M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$79.78
Change+$0.80 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.32B
RGSCX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. RSLFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 81.3B vs. RGSCX (41.8M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: RGSCX (1.49) vs RSLFX (0.83). RGSCX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: RGSCX (24 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: RSLFX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.59 vs. RGSCX (-11.76). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 11.63 vs. RGSCX (-32.73).
| RGSCX | RSLFX | RGSCX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 0.70 | 340% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.70 | 341% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.589 | 12.737 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.8M | 81.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 0.83 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.76 | 9.59 | -123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.12 | 45.55 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.73 | 11.63 | -281% |
| Returns for 10 years | -39.91 | 70.97 | -56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement