Ad is loading...
RGSCX vs RSLFX
RGSCX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs RSLFX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$23.10
Change+$0.17 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.73M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$73.04
Change+$0.76 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.73B
RGSCX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. RSLFX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 75.7B vs. RGSCX (44.7M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than RGSCX: RSLFX (0.87) vs RGSCX (0.00). RGSCX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: RGSCX (23 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). RGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.00 vs. RSLFX (29.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: RSLFX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.28 vs. RGSCX (-3.56). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.03 vs. RGSCX (-24.40).
| RGSCX | RSLFX | RGSCX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.125 | 3.178 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.7M | 75.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.87 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.56 | 9.28 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.89 | 0.58 | -1,532% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.40 | 23.03 | -106% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.87 | 61.96 | -61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...