Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs RSLFX
RGSCX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs RSLFX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$23.80
Change-$0.03 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.6M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$79.62
Change-$0.28 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.91B
RGSCX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. RSLFX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 81.9B vs. RGSCX (43.6M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: RGSCX (1.45) vs RSLFX (0.83). RGSCX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: RGSCX (24 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: RSLFX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.88 vs. RGSCX (-8.64). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.70 vs. RGSCX (-24.80).
| RGSCX | RSLFX | RGSCX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 0.70 | 340% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.70 | 341% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.384 | 12.511 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.6M | 81.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 0.83 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.64 | 9.88 | -87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.56 | 38.32 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.80 | 18.70 | -133% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.73 | 67.56 | -56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement