Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs RSLFX
RGSCX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs RSLFX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$23.99
Change+$0.24 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.6M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$75.67
Change+$0.97 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.91B
RGSCX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. RSLFX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a StrongBuy and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 76.9B vs. RGSCX (44.6M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: RGSCX (1.45) vs RSLFX (0.88). RGSCX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: RGSCX (23 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: RSLFX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.66 vs. RGSCX (-1.14). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 25.55 vs. RGSCX (-15.96).
| RGSCX | RSLFX | RGSCX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 0.70 | 340% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.70 | 341% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.027 | 6.929 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.6M | 76.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 0.88 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.14 | 9.66 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.05 | 30.41 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.96 | 25.55 | -62% |
| Returns for 10 years | -40.52 | 51.01 | -79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement