Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs RSLFX
RGSCX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs RSLFX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$23.87
Change+$0.06 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.16M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$76.95
Change+$0.29 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.11B
RGSCX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. RSLFX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Hold and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 79.1B vs. RGSCX (44.2M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: RGSCX (1.46) vs RSLFX (0.86). RGSCX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: RGSCX (24 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: RSLFX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.38 vs. RGSCX (-2.60). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.16 vs. RGSCX (-24.25).
| RGSCX | RSLFX | RGSCX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 0.70 | 340% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.70 | 341% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.295 | 8.738 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.2M | 79.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 0.86 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.60 | 15.38 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.89 | 24.05 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.25 | 16.16 | -150% |
| Returns for 10 years | -40.89 | 54.26 | -75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement