Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs RSLFX
RGSCX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs RSLFX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$24.31
Change+$0.21 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.94M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$76.85
Change+$0.80 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.16B
RGSCX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. RSLFX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 78.2B vs. RGSCX (44.9M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: RGSCX (1.43) vs RSLFX (0.86). RGSCX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: RGSCX (23 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: RSLFX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.23 vs. RGSCX (-6.51). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.96 vs. RGSCX (-18.72).
| RGSCX | RSLFX | RGSCX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 0.70 | 340% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.70 | 341% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.589 | 8.597 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.9M | 78.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.86 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.51 | 6.23 | -104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.90 | 35.52 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.72 | 20.96 | -89% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.45 | 50.74 | -82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement