Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs RSLFX
RGSCX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs RSLFX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$21.59
Change-$0.08 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.26M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$76.62
Change-$0.40 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.34B
RGSCX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. RSLFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Hold and RSLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 79.3B vs. RGSCX (38.3M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: RGSCX (1.52) vs RSLFX (0.82). RGSCX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: RGSCX (24 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). RGSCX (2.42) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (25.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: RSLFX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.74 vs. RGSCX (-16.60). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.93 vs. RGSCX (-40.01).
| RGSCX | RSLFX | RGSCX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 0.70 | 340% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.42 | 0.70 | 346% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.259 | 8.272 | -39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.3M | 79.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 0.82 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.60 | 6.74 | -246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.53 | 30.09 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.01 | 3.93 | -1,018% |
| Returns for 10 years | -43.87 | 62.49 | -70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement