Ad is loading...
RGSCX vs RSLFX
RGSCX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs RSLFX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$22.21
Change-$0.60 (-2.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.93M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$64.20
Change-$3.06 (-4.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.74B
RGSCX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. RSLFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Hold and RSLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 69.7B vs. RGSCX (43.9M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: RGSCX (1.52) vs RSLFX (0.95). RGSCX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: RGSCX (23 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: RSLFX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.78 vs. RGSCX (-6.96). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 53.55 vs. RGSCX (7.97).
| RGSCX | RSLFX | RGSCX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 0.70 | 340% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.70 | 341% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.830 | -4.987 | -37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.9M | 69.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 0.95 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.96 | -4.78 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.15 | -5.37 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.97 | 53.55 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | -43.41 | 39.00 | -111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers