Ad is loading...
RGSCX vs RSLFX
RGSCX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs RSLFX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$22.81
Change+$0.27 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.14M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$66.88
Change+$1.17 (+1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.94B
RGSCX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. RSLFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 67.9B vs. RGSCX (43.1M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: RGSCX (1.52) vs RSLFX (0.95). RGSCX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: RGSCX (23 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: RSLFX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.51 vs. RGSCX (-4.09). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.70 vs. RGSCX (-7.50).
| RGSCX | RSLFX | RGSCX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 0.70 | 340% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.70 | 341% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.625 | -5.523 | -11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.1M | 67.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 0.95 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.09 | -1.51 | 270% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.49 | 2.28 | -197% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.50 | 30.70 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | -44.00 | 35.17 | -125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers