Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs SFCWX
RGSCX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs SFCWX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$23.04
Change+$0.06 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.77M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$77.64
Change+$0.78 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.32B
RGSCX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. SFCWX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 81.3B vs. RGSCX (41.8M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than SFCWX: RGSCX (1.49) vs SFCWX (0.90). RGSCX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: RGSCX (24 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). SFCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). RGSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: RGSCX (2500) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.65 vs. RGSCX (-11.76). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 11.53 vs. RGSCX (-32.73).
| RGSCX | SFCWX | RGSCX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 0.65 | 366% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.65 | 368% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.589 | 12.770 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.8M | 81.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 0.90 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.76 | 9.65 | -122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.12 | 45.66 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.73 | 11.53 | -284% |
| Returns for 10 years | -39.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement